1994 · 1995 · 1996 · 1997 · 1998 · 1999 · 2000 · 2001 · 2002 · 2003 · 2004       Erik Naggum comp.lang.lisp archive

2001

January, 2001

• Re: character printing

March, 2001

• Re: boggle.lisp: feedback welcome
• Re: OpenScheme 1.3.6 available
• Re: ANSWER for Einstein's Riddle
• Re: OpenScheme 1.3.6 available

April, 2001

• Re: [Q] ELSE in LOOP
• Re: metering
• Re: Trouble with labels
• Re: Trouble with labels
• Re: Trouble with labels
• Re: Trouble with labels
• Re: Trouble with labels
• Re: Trouble with labels
• Re: Trouble with labels
• Re: Trouble with labels
• Re: Trouble with labels
• Re: Trouble with labels
• Re: design question
• Re: How to do (map (type-of x) ...) right
• Re: IF & AND redefined, why?
• Re: GUI Toolkit for Corman Lisp
• Re: IF & AND redefined, why?
• Re: symbolp and nil
• Re: symbolp and nil
• Re: #Hash#
• Re: writing out expressions prepended by #.
• Re: writing out expressions prepended by #.

May, 2001

• Re: Question on the role of :absolute and :relative directories and logical pathnames
• Re: Question on the role of :absolute and :relative directories and logical pathnames
• Re: Redefining CAR/CDR/other standard symbols (was Re: [Q] Dylan to Java/JVM compiler?)
• Re: [Q] Limitation of variables?
• Re: [Q] Limitation of variables?
• Re: [Q] Limitation of variables?
• Re: handler-bind
• Re: Namespaces, packages, and methods
• Re: To Paul Graham: Please put your books online.
• Re: ...and even for those _NOT_ interested...
• Re: ...and even for those _NOT_ interested...
• Re: ...and even for those _NOT_ interested...
• Re: ...and even for those _NOT_ interested...
• Re: sum over list?
• Re: franz: eli interface keybindings modified.
• Re: Beginner's Language?

June, 2001

• Re: aref inline?
• Re: [NOT] Re: To Paul Graham: Please put your books online.
• Re: To Paul Graham: Please put your books online.
• Re: URGENT: converting a bit-array to a number
• Re: Macro-writing in CL
• Re: Macro-writing in CL
• Re: Macro-writing in CL
• Re: Macro-writing in CL
• Re: Thoughts and sighs..
• Re: Macro-writing in CL
• Re: Macro-writing in CL
• Re: bleeding money out of clispers
• Re: bleeding money out of clispers
• Re: bleeding money out of clispers
• Re: bleeding money out of clispers
• Re: Macro-writing in CL
• Re: Macro-writing in CL
• Re: bleeding money out of clispers
• Re: bleeding money out of clispers
• Re: All instances
• Re: All instances
• Re: All instances
• Re: All instances
• Re: Macro-writing in CL
• Re: All instances
• Re: Read table modification question.
• Re: All instances
• Re: lisp as a day to day language
• Re: How to eval a function from a string with its name?
• Re: All instances
• Re: All instances
• Re: All instances
• Re: Optional timezone in ENCODE-UNIVERAL-TIME
• Re: Optional timezone in ENCODE-UNIVERAL-TIME

July, 2001

• Re: when are macros useful?
• Re: Engineering Envy [was: Re: CL and UML]
• Re: Engineering Envy [was: Re: CL and UML]
• Re: Engineering Envy [was: Re: CL and UML]
• Re: Engineering Envy [was: Re: CL and UML]
• Re: Engineering Envy [was: Re: CL and UML]
• Re: Engineering Envy [was: Re: CL and UML]
• Re: Engineering Envy [was: Re: CL and UML]
• Re: Engineering Envy [was: Re: CL and UML]
• Re: Management
• Re: Management
• Re: special forms.
• Re: special forms.
• Re: special forms.
• Re: array types (Re: Stupid question)
• Re: special forms.
• Re: Literate Programming
• Re: array types
• Re: array types
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: special forms.
• Re: array types
• Re: Problem with a named let.
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: Question about software "development"
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: Q: LispWorks on SuSE 7.2?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: How can I implement a function inside of a list?
• Re: newline and concatenate. length of a lisp function.
• Re: newline and concatenate. length of a lisp function.
• Re: was: newline and concatenate. length of a lisp function
• Re: was: newline and concatenate. length of a lisp function
• Re: multiple copies of a CLOS object?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?

August, 2001

• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: Yet another discussion of Erik Naggum (was: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?)
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: Yet another discussion of Erik Naggum (was: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?)
• Re: Yet another discussion of Erik Naggum (was: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?)
• Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?
• Re: Yet another discussion of Erik Naggum (was: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?)
• Re: Yet another discussion of Erik Naggum (was: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?)
• Re: Yet another discussion of Erik Naggum (was: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?)
• Re: Apprenticeship [was Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?]
• Re: Apprenticeship [was Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?]
• Re: trace calls from within mapcar or similar functions
• Re: Programming Style
• Re: Programming Style
• Re: Substring?
• Re: Could be a stupid question: Cmucl failing to compile
• Re: Substring?
• Re: Spam from usenet? (was: How to quit cmucl)
• Re: Representing code as XML: the Flare Programming Language
• Re: Polymorphism in Common Lisp
• Re: Three questions about type specifications
• Re: Some more misc. Lisp queries
• Re: Some more misc. Lisp queries
• Re: Some more misc. Lisp queries
• Re: XML and lisp
• Re: Some more misc. Lisp queries
• Re: XML and lisp
• Re: XML and lisp
• Re: XML and lisp
• Re: XML and lisp
• Re: XML and lisp
• Re: the "loop" macro
• Re: the "loop" macro
• Re: Some more misc. Lisp queries
• Re: MS Win32 CommonLisp
• Re: XML and lisp
• Re: XML and lisp
• Re: MS Win32 CommonLisp
• Re: the "loop" macro
• Re: the "loop" macro
• Re: the "loop" macro
• Re: the "loop" macro
• Re: the "loop" macro
• Re: the "loop" macro
• Re: the "loop" macro
• What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community

September, 2001

• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: MCL is alive and kicking...
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Maintaining Minority Languages ( was Re: A small survey (if you have couple of minutes))
• Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Effective approaches
• Re: Maintaining Minority Languages ( was Re: A small survey (if you have couple of minutes))
• Re: MCL is alive and kicking...
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Effective approaches
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: clarification of our position
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: clarification of our position
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: How can i make "case" to use equal?
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: I like WHEN/UNLESS Was: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: I like WHEN/UNLESS Was: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: I like WHEN/UNLESS Was: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: I like WHEN/UNLESS Was: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: flame wars, humor and serious request /was Re: Effective approaches
• Re: flame wars, humor and serious request /was Re: Effective approaches
• Re: flame wars, humor and serious request /was Re: Effective approaches
• Re: sets operations
• Re: Substring?
• Re: flame wars, humor and serious request /was Re: Effective approaches
• Re: How can i make "case" to use equal?
• Re: How can i make "case" to use equal?
• Re: flame wars, humor and serious request /was Re: Effective approaches
• Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?
• Re: On Lisp
• Re: On Lisp
• Re: the "loop" macro
• Re: On Lisp
• Re: flame wars, humor and serious request /was Re: Effective approaches
• Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?
• Re: Style question Was: Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: On Lisp
• Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?
• Re: Style question Was: Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
• Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?
• Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?
• Re: Free software (was Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?)
• Re: On Lisp
• Re: On Lisp
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: flame wars, humor and serious request /was Re: Effective approaches
• Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?
• Re: exported package (was Re: Free software)
• Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?
• Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?
• Re: Where's your Lisp software, Janos Blazi?
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: newbie exception handling question
• Re: On Lisp
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: market research--what would be "cheap enough"?
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: line wrapping in news messages
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: Lisp as a scripting language from within C++?
• Re: hallo world in lisp
• Re: market research--what would be "cheap enough"?
• Re: size of executables?
• Re: size of executables?
• Re: size of executables?
• Re: size of executables?
• Re: size of executables?
• Re: Common Lisp, the one true religion!
• Re: Finding the arity of a function
• Re: size of executables?
• Re: market research--what would be "cheap enough"?
• Re: size of executables?
• Re: low quality lisp books
• Re: low quality lisp books
• Re: size of executables?
• Re: Finding the arity of a function
• Re: Finding the arity of a function
• Re: Finding the arity of a function
• Re: low quality lisp books
• Re: low quality lisp books
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: output LISP
• Re: Lambda functions
• Re: Lambda functions
• Re: output LISP
• Re: Lambda functions
• Re: Lambda functions
• Re: Lambda functions
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: call/cc in lisp
• Re: EQ and FIXNUMS
• Re: EQ and FIXNUMS
• Re: Multiple LISP's?
• Re: Multiple LISP's?
• Re: How to do config files?
• Re: Multiple LISP's?
• Re: Schemely graphing calculators?
• Re: CL-Emacs (was Re: Multiple LISP's?)
• Re: packages
• Re: packages
• Re: CL-Emacs (was Re: Multiple LISP's?)

October, 2001

• Re: ANSI X3.226 in PDF at a bargain
• Re: ANSI X3.226 in PDF at a bargain
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Freedom of different opinions was: Offensive Language and Rude Manners in comp.lang.lisp; An Example...
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: initial value of *PRINT-CIRCLE*
• Re: Freedom of different opinions was: Offensive Language and Rude Manners in comp.lang.lisp; An Example...
• Re: Freedom of different opinions was: Offensive Language and Rude Manners in comp.lang.lisp; An Example...
• Re: Freedom of different opinions was: Offensive Language and Rude Manners in comp.lang.lisp; An Example...
• Re: Pause for keystroke
• Re: Pause for keystroke
• Re: sorting on defstruct slot
• Re: Query About Lisp Use
• Re: Coding style
• Re: Query About Lisp Use
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: CL and Embedded Systems (Re: Query About Lisp Use)
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: More inconsistencies with file/directory operations
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Question: Lisp's power points
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: an (in-this-scope...) special form to avoid excessive nesting in source code
• Re: Question: Lisp's power points
• Re: How to split a string (or arbitrary sequence) at each occurrence of a value.
• Re: How to split a string (or arbitrary sequence) at each occurrence of a value.
• Re: How to split a string (or arbitrary sequence) at each occurrence of a value.
• Re: How to split a string (or arbitrary sequence) at each occurrence of a value.
• Re: Question: Lisp's power points
• Re: How to split a string (or arbitrary sequence) at each occurrence of a value.
• Re: A simple quesion...
• Where are they teaching Common Lisp these days?
• Re: Newbie stumped on list element manipulation.
• Re: Question: Lisp's power points
• Re: Question: Lisp's power points
• Re: A simple quesion...
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: IBM patents macro expansion.
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: Big Numbers
• Re: CLISP `executables' (idiot question)
• Re: Big Numbers
• Re: CLISP `executables' (idiot question)
• Re: Big Numbers
• Re: Fast graphics on Lisp
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Big Numbers
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Newby getting sad and frustrated tying to get lisp to work.
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Primitives for "stings"
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: Primitives for "stings"
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: Declare and Progn
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: 3 Lisps, 3 Ways of Specifying OS
• Re: zerop
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Help wiht LISP Function (Newbie)
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Help wiht LISP Function (Newbie)
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Lisp entry changed in Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Question / comment about DIRECTORY
• Re: Question / comment about DIRECTORY
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Why is there no letstruct in Lisp?
• Re: What's the point of flet?
• Re: What's the point of flet?
• Re: lisp question ~ ^*^
• Re: Tail recursion & CL
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: What's the point of flet?
• Re: What's the point of flet?
• Re: Lisp's public image...
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions

November, 2001

• Re: Save to file/restore from file - Lisp structures
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: What's the point of flet?
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Beginner Learner
• Re: Is there a FAQ?
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Clearing eof condition from stream.
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Clearing eof condition from stream.
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: BNF for Common Lisp Grammar.
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia
• Re: symbol-function vs. #'
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: Reading a list
• Re: List comprehension
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: "On Lisp" by Paul Graham
• Re: Lisp Jobs (was Re: Slashdot)
• Re: Common Lisp and the Little Schemer
• Re: Slashdot
• Re: [LISP Beginner] Recursion Problem
• Re: Lisp Jobs (was Re: Slashdot)
• Re: Lisp Jobs (was Re: Slashdot)
• Re: Tail recursion elimination in methods
• Re: Escaping in strings
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: Lisp Jobs (was Re: Slashdot)
• Re: PROGN for *ML?
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: LispWorks with ILISP (Was: OK, CLIM it is. Now my options are...)
• Re: Benefits of moving from Python to Common Lisp?
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: Macros OR, AND
• Re: Destructive Side Effects
• Re: Destructive Side Effects
• Re: Destructive Side Effects
• Re: Macros OR, AND
• Re: Destructive Side Effects
• Re: Macros OR, AND
• Re: MD5 in LISP and abstraction inversions
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: Specialized equal
• Re: Checking for Errors Before Run Time
• Re: I'm outta here...
• On conditionals
• Re: Checking for Errors Before Run Time
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: Checking for Errors Before Run Time
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: Must MAPCAR substitute NIL for nothing?
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: Lisp and trees
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: Lisp and trees
• Re: On conditionals
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: SETF : Ambiguous?
• Re: Unable to read a list with 'with-open-file'
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: SETF : Ambiguous?
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: LISP format (happy to read)
• Re: How to add characters to an atom?
• Re: LISP format (happy to read)
• Re: LISP format (happy to read)
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: Design patterns for Lisp
• Re: Design patterns for Lisp
• Re: [NEWBIE] - Lisp or CLOS ?
• Re: Lisp and trees
• Re: LISP format (happy to read)
• Re: [NEWBIE] - Lisp or CLOS ?
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: I'm outta here...
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: Design patterns for Lisp
• Revisiting split-sequence and patterns
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: Revisiting split-sequence and patterns
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: Converting a list to a string
• Re: G'day, mates, how 'ya goin'?
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: Paul Graham describes his new Lisp dialect, "Arc"
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: Paul Graham describes his new Lisp dialect, "Arc"
• Re: Preventing a class from being instantiated
• Re: Paul Graham describes his new Lisp dialect, "Arc"
• Re: Preventing a class from being instantiated
• Re: Preventing a class from being instantiated
• Re: On nil qua false [was: Re: On conditionals]
• Re: Paul Graham describes his new Lisp dialect, "Arc"
• Re: Preventing a class from being instantiated
• Re: Preventing a class from being instantiated
• Re: Fw: How to convert "((X))" to X
• Re: Preventing a class from being instantiated
• Re: Number of programmers

December, 2001

• Re: In praise of Java.
• Re: Design patterns for Lisp
• Re: indexes into clhs v5
• Re: C++ cycle time
• Re: Design patterns for Lisp
• Re: Revisiting split-sequence and patterns
• Re: Preventing a class from being instantiated
• Re: Little doubts with "if" clause
• Re: In praise of Java.
• Re: In praise of Java.
• Re: Little doubts with "if" clause
• Re: Little doubts with "if" clause
• Re: Little doubts with "if" clause
• Re: Number of programmers
• Re: In praise of Java.
• Re: Little doubts with "if" clause
• Re: Little doubts with "if" clause
• Re: How to reverse a list...
• Re: FORMAT and cardinal nos.
• Re: How to reverse a list...
• Re: How to reverse a list...
• Re: In praise of Java.
• Re: Design patterns for Lisp
• Re: Package Question
• Re: One Man's Language Comparison for Estimating Codebase Size Reduction
• Re: original Lisp and Common Lisp
• Re: Computer Science Education
• Re: Computer Science Education
• Re: trace-all
• Re: Lisp as replacement for python
• Re: Lisp as replacement for python
• Re: command line shells
• The history of print, prin1, and princ?
• Re: command line shells
• Re: The history of print, prin1, and princ?
• Re: easy plural formatting question
• Re: Debugging Questions
• Re: what is the mnemonic behind nstring-* functions ?
• Re: Why Arc isn't especially OO
• Re: Announcing release of Semaphors under GNU GPL
• Re: Destructors for CLOS objects
• Re: Cells instead of Semaphors?
• Re: Why Arc isn't especially OO
• Re: Cells instead of Semaphors?
• Re: Protocols? WAS: Why Arc isn't especially OO
• Re: realistic but short and simple LISP examples?
• Re: realistic but short and simple LISP examples?
• Re: realistic but short and simple LISP examples?
• Re: Question about open/read-byte...
• Re: Why Arc isn't especially OO
• Re: #.#'
• Re: Aliasing slots
• Re: Why Arc isn't especially OO
• Re: realistic but short and simple LISP examples?
• Re: realistic but short and simple LISP examples?
• Re: CMUCL: How to call system functions 'sh' and 'getenv' from lisp?
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
• Re: predicate?
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
• Re: &REST in VALUES type specifier
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme? (Dr N. and Mr N)
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme? (Dr N. and Mr N)
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
• Re: Writing CLOS objects to a file portably?
• Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
• Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
• Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
• Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
• Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
• Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
• Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
• Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
• Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
• Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
• Re: At the heart of Lisp and Prolog
• Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
• Re: Time for a Fresh Lisp Standard: Say Goodbye to the ANSI Common Lisp standard (X3.226-1994)
• Re: error in lispworks' #'directory or in my head???
• Re: New Lisp ?
• Re: request for people to comment on my code
• Re: New Lisp ?
• Re: Beginner question: performance problems with a simple program
• Re: New Lisp ?
• Re: New Lisp ?
• Re: what makes a production quality programer? (was Re: New Lisp ?)
• Re: Comparing development effort : Lisp and functional languages versus Java.
• Re: Beginner question: performance problems with a simple program
• Re: (let (flet (multiple-value-bind (etc.))))
• Re: what makes a production quality programer? (was Re: New Lisp ?)
• Re: what makes a production quality programer? (was Re: New Lisp ?)

Part of the Erik Naggum comp.lang.lisp archive