1994 · 1995 · 1996 · 1997 · 1998 · 1999 · 2000 · 2001 · 2002 · 2003 · 2004       Erik Naggum comp.lang.lisp archive

1998

January, 1998

• Re: Q: 101 Buzzwords in Scheme
• Re: why we have cons?
• Re: why we have cons?
• Re: why we have cons?
• Re: a view of comp lang [was: why we have cons]
• Re: why we have cons?
• Re: why we have cons?
• Re: make-pathname and :defaults
• Re: dumb newbie question
• Re: dumb newbie question
• Re: CL (CLISP vs CMUCL) performance on Linux
• Re: Modifying stream printing ? Possible ? Portable ?
• Re: gcl quirks
• Re: delete?
• COMPLEMENT and -IF-NOT functions
• Re: delete?
• Re: recursive function that returns true/false (newbie stuff)
• Re: recursive function that returns true/false (newbie stuff)
• Re: COMPLEMENT and -IF-NOT functions
• Re: recursive function that returns true/false (newbie stuff)
• Re: COMPLEMENT and -IF-NOT functions
• Re: COMPLEMENT and -IF-NOT functions
• Re: COMPLEMENT and -IF-NOT functions
• Re: COMPLEMENT and -IF-NOT functions

February, 1998

• Re: Does Common Lisp have a socket library?
• Re: Vector help
• Re: Help needed in handling large LISP file
• Re: circular dependencies: what is "The Right Thing"?
• Re: Need help!!
• Re: ANSI CL proposal: format
• Re: Problem solved (was: Dead end in LISP implementation)
• Re: 2 Common Lisp Questions
• Re: 2 Common Lisp Questions
• Re: ANSI CL proposal: format

March, 1998

• Re: output S.O.S.
• Re: type: (or something nil)
• Re: generic functions
• Re: type: (or something nil)
• Re: Upper/Lower Triangular Matrix-P?
• lambda list in MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND?
• Re: eof in Common Lisp
• Re: lambda list in MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND?
• Re: (not really about) MCL
• Re: Default package use list
• Re: Default package use list
• Re: Floating Point speed in Common Lisp
• Re: Floating Point speed in Common Lisp
• access to declaration information?
• Re: Floating Point speed in Common Lisp
• Re: Floating Point speed in Common Lisp
• Re: Q: Scheme style macro transformers in common lisp
• Re: Help
• Re: DECLARE, DECLAIM and PROCLAIM that I'm not sure I understand the difference!
• Re: constants in functions
• Re: Problem with iteration
• Re: princ & *print-readably*
• Re: Emacs extensions in Perl
• Re: dealing with errors (was: "Programming is FUN again")
• Re: dealing with errors (was: "Programming is FUN again")
• Re: dealing with errors (was: "Programming is FUN again")
• Re: dealing with errors (was: "Programming is FUN again")
• Re: Floating Point speed in Common Lisp
• Re: dealing with errors (was: "Programming is FUN again")
• Re: Printer Questions
• Re: Overwriting Functions/Macros?

April, 1998

• Re: Overwriting Functions/Macros?
• Re: Overwriting Functions/Macros?
• Re: Better way to do this?
• Re: Can you multi-thread in LISP
• Re: Can you multi-thread in LISP
• Re: (en|de)code-universal-time
• Re: iteration over multidimensional array
• Re: Simple characters in the CL Standard
• Re: Learning CLOS?
• Re: Simple characters in the CL Standard
• Re: A lisp question
• Re: Functions as arguments in xlisp
• Re: Inherited shared slots
• Re: temporarily setting a package
• Re: A lisp question
• Re: temporarily setting a package
• Re: temporarily setting a package
• Re: Good I/O performance
• Re: Inherited shared slots
• Re: Good I/O performance
• Re: Good I/O performance
• Re: ===> HELP!!!
• Re: merge-pathnames
• Re: merge-pathnames
• Re: How can I translate C++ into CLOS?
• Re: beginner question
• Re: help! (run-line encoding)
• Re: help! (run-line encoding)
• Re: help! (run-line encoding)
• Re: beginner question

May, 1998

• Re: General Lisp questions...
• Re: General Lisp questions...
• Re: is CLOS reall OO?
• Re: is CLOS reall OO?
• Re: Free Common Lisp for PPC?
• printing money in C++ and in Common Lisp
• Re: Free Common Lisp for PPC?
• Re: ACL vs. CLISP
• Re: Why use slot names at all? (was Re: tresspassing)
• Re: printing money in C++ and in Common Lisp
• Re: printing money in C++ and in Common Lisp
• Re: printing money in C++ and in Common Lisp
• Re: One the Mark Kantrowitz copyright
• Re: Cheating Franz
• Re: ACL, CLISP and pathnames
• Re: ACL, CLISP and pathnames
• Re: ACL, CLISP and pathnames
• Re: Is there any lisp compiler generating exec files?
• Re: ACL, CLISP and pathnames
• Re: reference book
• Re: ACL, CLISP and pathnames
• Re: ACL, CLISP and pathnames
• Re: Newby question - Hygenic macros vs. other kinds
• Re: Correct use of "progv"?
• Re: is CLOS reall OO?
• Re: Y2K again
• Re: the `the' thingy
• Re: Y2K
• Re: the `the' thingy
• Re: Genera Y2K patch (long msg)
• Re: case sensetivity
• Re: Allegro/Emacs C-a fix
• Re: help w/ &key in macros

June, 1998

• Re: keywords vs. quoted symbols
• Re: help w/ &key in macros
• Re: help w/ &key in macros
• Re: help w/ &key in macros
• Re: ACL debugging
• Re: case sensitivity
• Re: ACL debugging
• Re: Allegro/Emacs C-a fix
• Re: backtracking in LISP versus PROLOG
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: Can I overload equal?
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: free market bashing (was Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro)
• Re: free market bashing (was Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro)
• Re: NEED HELP PLEASE
• Re: writing/printing hash-tables to a file
• Re: free market bashing (was Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro)
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: free market bashing (was Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro)
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro
• Re: Can I overload equal?

July, 1998

• Re: Which make-pathname function is broken?
• Re: how to efficiently concatenate strings?
• Re: Package System and new dialect
• Re: Warnings?
• Re: Package System and new dialect
• Re: Package System and new dialect
• Re: Package System and new dialect
• Re: multiple-values and `let'
• Re: multiple-values and `let'
• Re: Customize Emacs Lisp reader?
• Re: multiple-values and `let'
• Re: porting from a dialect with a different keyword style
• Re: why is this code inefficient??

August, 1998

• Re: `loop' and arrays
• Re: `loop' and arrays
• Re: ACL5beta: #'character
• Re: How is Lisp "better"?
• Re: How is Lisp "better"?
• Re: How is Lisp "better"?
• Re: How is Lisp "better"?
• Re: Lisp Jobs
• Re: New commercial product written in Lisp looks like a winner.
• Re: New commercial product written in Lisp looks like a winner.
• Re: New commercial product written in Lisp looks like a winner.
• Re: lisp essay by Richard Gabriel
• Re: New commercial product written in Lisp looks like a winner.
• Re: Who needs another Lisp _standard_? (Was: Re: islisp)

September, 1998

• Re: Who needs another Lisp _standard_? (Was: Re: islisp)
• Re: Who needs another Lisp _standard_? (Was: Re: islisp)
• Re: CL & CORBA
• Re: CL & CORBA
• Re: CL & CORBA
• Re: Possible bug in inverse Trig funcs in ACL
• Re: Who needs another Lisp _standard_? (Was: Re: islisp)
• Re: CL & CORBA
• Re: CL & CORBA
• Re: Grok (was: Re: I don't understand Lisp)
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: (describe-differences "Scheme" "Common Lisp")
• Re: Review: Patterns of Software by Richard Gabriel
• Re: Limitations?
• Re: MIME (off-topic was Re: Review: Patterns of Software by Richard Gabriel)
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: (describe-differences "Scheme" "Common Lisp")
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: (describe-differences "Scheme" "Common Lisp")
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: CLIM and GUI builders
• Re: Looking for a LISP function or macro ...
• Re: Emacs Lisp interpreter in CL
• Re: (describe-differences "Scheme" "Common Lisp")
• Re: Lisp programs are themselves Lists -- this is the Litmus Test
• Re: (describe-differences "Scheme" "Common Lisp")
• Re: Need help: Symbol comparison?
• Re: CLIM and GUI builders
• Re: (describe-differences "Scheme" "Common Lisp")
• Re: Looking for a LISP function or macro ...
• Re: Looking for a LISP function or macro ...
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: Substitute for COMPILER-LET?
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: usage of (if.....
• Re: "Wrong" results from _Common LISPcraft_ scope example
• Re: "Wrong" results from _Common LISPcraft_ scope example
• Re: Help: Result of "directory" function. Wich of names received are "directory" names?

October, 1998

• Re: Append object to list - Question
• Re: string -> list
• Re: defun within let
• Re: ACL Unix vs. ACL Linux
• Re: clisp: compile Lisp program to stand alone binary?
• Re: Funny Patents
• Re: clisp: compile Lisp program to stand alone binary?
• Re: clisp: compile Lisp program to stand alone binary?
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: Using compile on an #<Interpreted Closure ??
• Re: Converting an array into a list
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: Changing printing depth
• Re: Finding CLOS instances
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: I want to learn LISP
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: What's the point?
• Re: How to write implode and explode?
• Re: How to write implode and explode?
• Re: SCHEME question
• Re: compiling cmulisp
• Re: Interested in CommonLISP
• Re: Filk, puns, and other time wasting.
• Re: Filk, puns, and other time wasting.
• Re: Filk, puns, and other time wasting.
• Re: Filk, puns, and other time wasting.
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: A Philosophical Diversion
• Re: Filk, puns, and other time wasting.

November, 1998

• Re: setf'able?
• Re: Promoting Lisp
• Re: setf'able?
• Re: Promoting Lisp
• Re: dynamic redefinition of classes
• Re: dynamic redefinition of classes
• Re: dynamic redefinition of classes
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: dynamic redefinition of classes
• Re: dynamic redefinition of classes
• Re: How to write Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: dynamic redefinition of classes
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: pitman laid off by harlequin
• Re: I don't understand Lisp
• Re: Uppercasing symbols
• Re: Harlequin changing focus (was Re: changing focus...)
• Re: `read-sequence' and sockets
• Re: changing focus...
• Re: Uppercasing symbols
• Re: Stalin is not a cool name ( was: High performance Lisp implementations?)
• Re: Stalin is not a cool name ( was: High performance Lisp implementations?)
• Re: Stalin is not a cool name ( was: High performance Lisp implementations?)
• Re: Stalin is not a cool name ( was: High performance Lisp implementations?)
• Re: bit-reversal in Lisp?
• Re: Stalin is not a cool name for software
• Re: Is ``Lisp'' such a bad word?
• Re: Learning LISP?

December, 1998

• Re: Stalin is not a cool name for software
• Re: Learning LISP?
• Re: Learning LISP?
• Re: Obtaining the case preserved name of a macro
• Re: Does LISP have a "union" construct?
• Re: FAQ: How do I alter CLTL2 to note ANSI changes?
• Re: Trees
• Re: C++ gets dynamic redefinition (but does it wrong)
• Re: declaring something to be NOT special...
• Re: about run-time class (type) checks...
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: Uppercasing symbols
• Re: lisp from perl
• Re: Uppercasing symbols
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: `cond', IF .. THEN .. ELSE syntax vx. IF, WHEN, and COND
• Re: `cond', IF .. THEN .. ELSE syntax vx. IF, WHEN, and COND
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: Lisp source code as lists (rather than something richer)
• Re: The Aesthetics of Symbols (was Re: Uppercasing symbols)
• Re: The Aesthetics of Symbols (was Re: Uppercasing symbols)
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: The Aesthetics of Symbols (was Re: Uppercasing symbols)
• Re: allegro CL debugging
• Re: The Aesthetics of Symbols (was Re: Uppercasing symbols)
• Re: LISP for Windows
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: LISP for Windows
• Re: LISP for Windows
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: Vector syntax for a string?
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: sorting...
• Re: sorting...
• Re: sorting...
• Re: Apps in Lisp (was: Re: help! absolute beginner)
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: OS wars and Lisp
• Re: Off topic: FSF, Emacs and XEmacs (was Re: help! absolute beginner)
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: Apps in Lisp (was: Re: help! absolute beginner)
• Re: Question on streams and buffering for acl5/linux
• Re: OS wars and Lisp
• Re: Off topic: FSF, Emacs and XEmacs (was Re: help! absolute beginner)
• Re: Lisp-based protocols [was Re: OS wars and Lisp]
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: ACL and low-level GC
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: ACL and low-level GC
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: ILISP (and its mailing list) problem with CLISP
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: help! absolute beginner
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: file to string conversion
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: Free vs Commercial Lisp
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: read-sequence & ACL
• Re: CLOS macros: `with-slots' vs `with-accessors'
• Re: OT: Usenet lack of civility (was Re: Logical pathname hosts.)
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: read-sequence & ACL
• Re: OT: Usenet lack of civility (was Re: Logical pathname hosts.)
• Re: read-sequence & ACL
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: OT: Usenet lack of civility (was Re: Logical pathname hosts.)
• Re: OT: Usenet lack of civility (was Re: Logical pathname hosts.)
• Re: Logical pathname hosts.
• Re: OT: Usenet lack of civility (was Re: Logical pathname hosts.)
• Re: Free vs Commercial Lisp
• Re: Doh!
• Re: OT: Usenet lack of civility (was Re: Logical pathname hosts.)
• Re: ACL 4.3 For Linux license concerns
• Re: OT: Usenet lack of civility (was Re: Logical pathname hosts.)
• Re: Free vs Commercial Lisp
• Re: ACL 4.3 For Linux license concerns
• Re: Free vs Commercial Lisp
• Re: OT: Usenet lack of civility (was Re: Logical pathname hosts.)
• Re: copying an array...
• Re: Free vs Commercial Lisp
• Re: Doh!
• Re: Free vs Commercial Lisp
• Re: ACL 4.3 For Linux license concerns
• Re: Free vs Commercial Lisp
• Re: copying an array...

Part of the Erik Naggum comp.lang.lisp archive