1998
January
- Re: scheme-based hardware description language?
- Re: a view of comp lang [was: why we have cons]
- Re: remainder
- Re: LISP to Scheme
- Re: Looking for Scheme implementation for IRIX 6.3
- Re: First Language (ever)
- Re: Scheme's awful syntax (was Re: prompting a user)
- Re: CGIs with Lisp
February
- Re: Parsing/Lexing in Scheme
- Re: MIT? Early!?!?
- Re: free variables
- Re: SCHEME tutorial
- Re: Dead end in LISP implementation
- Re: Scheme software
- Re: LAND*: an AND with local bindings
- Re: Dead end in LISP implementation
- Re: Problem solved (was: Dead end in LISP implementation)
March
- Re: R5RS is available
- Re: shadowing syntatic keywords, bug in MIT Scheme?
- Scheme promises [was: Re: "Programming is FUN again"...]
- Re: "Programming is FUN again" rambling commentary
- Re: Splitting strings
- Re: Little Lisp Web Server?
- Re: R5RS is available
- Re: GC algorithm needed
- Re: Objects and Scheme?
- Re: tail recursiveness
- Re: Emacs extensions in Perl
- Re: dealing with errors (was: "Programming is FUN again")
- Re: Lisp classes
- Re: dealing with errors (was: "Programming is FUN again")
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC (was: Re: "Programming is FUN again" rambling commentary (especially the rambling part)
April
- Re: Good I/O performance
- Re: beginner question
- Re: beginner question
- Re: beginner question
- Re: beginner question
May
- Re: Load and execute
- Re: I miss progv
- Re: naming conventions?
- Re: values (STk vs. SCSH)
- Re: Y2K again
- Re: YASOS: closures/code sharing
- Re: Which Scheme are you using?
June
- Re: R6RS: Why is it needed?
- Re: R6RS: Why is it needed?
- Re: Which Scheme are you using?
- Re: letrec-syntax
- Re: Mixing Scheme and C [was: Which Scheme are you using?]
- Re: define-syntax: considered harmful.
- Re: PLT DrScheme
- Re: define-syntax: considered harmful.
- Re: Mixing Scheme and C [was: Which Scheme are you using?]
- Re: Mixing Scheme and C [was: Which Scheme are you using?]
- Re: PLT DrScheme
- Re: define-syntax: considered harmful (was PLT DRScheme)
- sizes of bytes [was: Re: IO in R6RS]
- Re: Teaching Programming
- Re: car/cdr vs 1st/rst vs ..., teaching programming, etc.
- Re: free market bashing (was Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro)
- Re: free market bashing (was Re: Harlequin vs. Allegro)
July
- Re: Return Values
- Re: problems with SCM 'dump'
- Re: Implementation issues
- Re: Package System and new dialect
- Re: !! Please Help!! -- teaching question
- Re: Why is 'if' a special form?
- Re: Why is 'if' a special form?
- Re: multiple-values and `let'
- Re: [Q] Regular expressions and environment vars in Scheme
August
- Re: representing strings??
- Re: Character to symbol
- Re: MIT's 6.001 scheme for Windows machines
- Re: Plethora of implementations
- Re: Standard Module System, (was Redistributable Scheme tutorial, Environments, OO)
- Re: CL CGIs
- Re: The SRE regular-expression notation
September
October
- Re: winSIOD installation problems
- Re: Optionnal Arguments in DrScheme
- Re: Scheme Pre-Interpretor: UPDATE
- Re: A Philosophical Diversion
- Re: Heinlein and Laziness
- Re: trouble reading binary files (with STk)
- Re: Filk, puns, and other time wasting.
- Re: Filk, puns, and other time wasting.
- Re: Tail recursion: Is it just a fancy name for iteration?
- Re: solving a maze in scheme
- Re: tail recursion
- Re: Calling a function with your &rest
- Re: Stacks, lists, and the cost of consing (was Re: Tail recursion)
- Re: macro and extend-syntax
November
- Re: Help
- Re: setf'able?
- Re: continuations in combinations?
- Re: Promoting Lisp
- Re: Lisp interpreter library
- Re: Lisp as a scripting language?
- Re: problem /w palindroms
- Re: Lisp as a scripting language?
- Re: my notes from the Scheme workshop at ICFP98
- Re: Embedding SCM
- Re: my notes from the Scheme workshop at ICFP98
- Re: problem /w palindroms
- Re: commands vs. expressions?
- Re: Uppercasing symbols
- Re: Using file data transparently as internal data?
- Re: clisp's socket interface
- Re: Obtaining the case preserved name of a macro
December
- Re: patent on fix and continue
- Re: Questions... I am new to scheme
- Re: Obtaining the case preserved name of a macro
- Re: string/numeric conversions?
- Re: Questions... I am new to scheme
- Re: Harlequin changing focus (was Re: changing focus...)
- Re: Uppercasing symbols
- Re: scheme-based mud client
- Re: elk not tail-recursive?
- Re: Questions... I am new to scheme
- Re: Questions... I am new to scheme
- Re: 32-bit crunching in Scheme?
- Re: help! absolute beginner
- Re: help! absolute beginner
- Re: 32-bit crunching in Scheme?
- Re: 32-bit crunching in Scheme?
- Re: (none)
- Re: LISP for Windows
- Re: 32-bit crunching in Scheme?
- Elk internals [was: Re: 32-bit crunching in Scheme?]
- Re: Elk internals
- Re: help! absolute beginner
- Re: tail recursion
- Re: Tail Recursive version of fibonacci
- Re: read-sequence & ACL