1999
January
- Re: Garbage hunting
- Re: Repeated lambda variables
- Re: process simulation and scheduling
- Re: ABSOLUTE PROOF==Jesus *is* Lord of the Sabbath !!
- Re: Scheme Tutorial
- Re: Porting from MACLISP?
- Re: A portable DIRECTORY-P. Re: Here we go again. More CMUCL/ACL pathname differences.
- Re: hashtable w/o keys stored...
- Re: [historical] Invoking a Lisp compiler
- Re: [historical] Invoking a Lisp compiler
- Re: fuzzy string matcher in Lisp
- Re: Scheme compilation
February
- Re: Scheme compilation
- Re: lambdaconf
- Re: How to define my own special forms in SCHEME ?
- Re: Java is really convenient. Re: Sun thinks about switching Java to S-expression syntax: Lava
- Re: scsh & a Posix SRFI
- Re: Installing CMU CL. Missing files?
- Re: More LispOS talk (was Re: Lisp subverts the world (was Re: ints vs fixnums (was Re: Java ... (was Re: ... (was Re: ...)))))
- Re: Java is really convenient. Re: Sun thinks about switching Java to S-expression syntax: Lava
- Re: siod, adding scheme standard procedures?
- Re: Java is really convenient. Re: Sun thinks about switching Java to S-expression syntax: Lava
- Re: Java is really convenient. Re: Sun thinks about switching Java to S-expression syntax: Lava
- Re: Java is really convenient. Re: Sun thinks about switching Java to S-expression syntax: Lava
- Re: building scm with scmlit
- Re: let and garbage collection
- Re: building scm with scmlit
- Re: Barriers to Lisp acceptance - a "survey" question
- Re: Barriers to Lisp acceptance - a "survey" question
- Re: is there a procedure "atom?" ?
March
- Can fluid-let be tail-call-clean?
- Re: THX for help. Another question...
- Re: Parallel Scheme?
- Re: Barriers to Lisp acceptance - a "survey" question
- Re: Emacs and CL (was Re: More LispOS talk (was Re: Lisp subverts the world (was Re: ints vs fixnums (was Re: Java ... (was Re: ... (was Re: ...))))))
- Re: Futures
- Re: (no subject)
- Re: (no subject)
- Re: (no subject)
- Re: Representing Time
- Re: one error, + a call for opinions
- Re: Representing Time
- Re: PROGN considered intrusive?
- Re: Scheme for Unix programming/scripting
- Re: Getting started with macros
- Re: Urgent Help with N-Queens Problem
April
- Re: Constants and DEFCONSTANT
- Re: Implementing multiple return values
- Re: Constants and DEFCONSTANT
- Re: Constants and DEFCONSTANT
- Re: co-routines (Ex: Re: Series. #)
- Re: Series. (was Re: About loops)
- Re: Series. (was Re: About loops)
- Re: Read-time _apply_: an external representation for any value
- Re: Read-time _apply_: an external representation for any value
- Re: Scheme for Unix, updated version
- Re: slib and MzScheme
- Re: time zone range
- Re: tail recursion, again...
- Re: Please help!
May
- Re: Newbie questions [Followup to comp.lang.lisp]
- Re: Newbie questions [Followup to comp.lang.lisp]
- Standardization [was: Re: Newbie questions...]
- Re: SICP (2Ed) Ch. 5 question?...
- Re: math functions not working in scheme48 ???
- Re: what does this scheme function do?
June
- Re: Parsing Tools in CL?
- Re: simple list?
- Re: IEEE Scheme
- Re: Lisp syntax, what about resynchronization?
- Re: Implode and explode with drscheme
- Re: why is the cdr pronounced could-er?
- Re: Applying AND
July
- Re: Scheme question
- Re: Loop
- Re: case query
- Re: Scope of the name of a named let; bugs in SRFI 5 and scm
- Re: Storing, accessing type information at run time
- Re: Emacs Lisp
- Re: Scope of the name of a named let; bugs in SRFI 5 and scm
- Re: function ports?
- Re: Is LISP dying?
- Re: Concatenating strings in Allegro CL
- Re: Is LISP dying?
- Re: Is LISP dying?
- Re: Is LISP dying?
- Re: Harlequin Is Back!
- Re: Is LISP dying?
- Re: FAQ 7.17: How can I access a dynamic variable while a similarly named lexical is in scope?
- Re: Learning programming languages -- was Re: Harlequin Is Back!
- Re: What does #+<anything-here> mean?
- Re: FAQ 7.17: How can I access a dynamic variable while a similarly named lexical is in scope?
- Re: GCL2.2 on IRIX, help needed!
- Re: What does #+<anything-here> mean?
- Re: What does #+<anything-here> mean?
- Re: Open Source in the UK (Was Re: Advantages of lisp over ML?)
- Re: Is LISP dying?
- Re: Scheme lint?
- Re: CMU CL vs. CLISP?
- Re: returning from a function (Ex: Re: some small proposed changes to standard)
- Re: CMU CL vs. CLISP?
- Re: returning from a function (Ex: Re: some small proposed changes to standard)
- Re: returning from a function (Ex: Re: some small proposed changes to standard)
- Re: DrScheme comments
- physical randomness [was: Re: CMU CL vs. CLISP? ]
- Re: Core Lisp (was Re: cautios question (about languages))
- Re: Core Lisp (was Re: cautios question (about languages))
- Re: cautios question (about languages)
August
- Re: Core Lisp (was Re: cautios question (about languages))
- Re: Counting bits in fixnums
- Re: eof-error-p/eof-value
- Re: Core Lisp (was Re: cautios question (about languages))
- Re: Comments, was Re: Parentheses Hierarchy
- Re: Anyone knows a GUI-SDK or GUI-builder for Powerlisp on Mac ?
- Re: eval in tail-recursion position
- Re: How to implement following procedures in Scheme?
- Re: fdefinition vs. symbol-function
- Re: Loading file as function
- Re: What goes into a documentation string?
- Re: Last rights.
- Re: call-next-next-method
- Re: syntax question
- Re: embeded scheme
- Re: continuation
September
- Re: source access vs dynamism
- Re: free lisp compilers?
- Re: Implementing Closures
- Re: Implementing Closures
- Re: private variable
- Re: Avoiding unintentional variable capture
- Re: Avoiding unintentional variable capture
- Re: unbound variable in macro
- Re: RnRS legal identifier names
- Re: Problem with display output
- Re: regex and http in scheme
October
- Re: newbie needs a little help parsing a comma delimited file
- Re: unbound variable in macro
- Re: checking if symbol is a function.
- Re: sending output from display to a file
- Re: portable RnRS regexps (was Re: regex and http in scheme
- Re: Macros using local variables
- Re: transpose of a matrix
- Re: A Proposed Specification for Lisp REGEXP
- Re: Seeking elegance :-)
- Re: Case Implementation
- Re: LISP for embedded systems
- Re: `while' in Lisp? + loop vs do?
- Re: list->string question
- Re: LISP for embedded systems
- Re: evaluation
- Re: LISP for embedded systems
- &optional and &key in Scheme [was: Re: LISP for embedded systems ]
- Re: LISP for embedded systems
- Re: LISP for embedded systems
- Re: Does a variable exist? NEWBIE NEWBIE NEW
- Re: Vote for Lisp
- Re: SUMMA SUMMARUM LISP
- Re: SUMMA SUMMARUM LISP
November
- Re: LISP and C++
- Re: tab literal in scheme.
- Re: Dumbing down...
- Re: How do I define swap procedure ?
- Re: Entwicklung von Scheme
- Re: Functional programming
- Re: Functional programming
- Re: schem function
- Re: Functional programming
- Re: Functional programming
- Re: Functional programming
- Re: "Knight's Tour"
- Re: why are tags and data packed together?
- Re: power-set
- Re: Displaying current time/date
- Re: Displaying current time/date
- Re: power-set
- Re: Where is Scheme v5?
- Re: Problem displaying results
- Re: Making an engineering case for Lisp
- Re: anonymous and recursive procedures?...
- Re: hash tables with a copying memory gc
- Re: Announcing LAML: Using Scheme as a markup language
- Re: How to call a C++ function from inside DrScheme?
- Re: Why Scheme?
- Re: Why Scheme?
- Re: Latte (Re: Announcing LAML: Using Scheme as a markup language)
- Re: Latte (Re: Announcing LAML: Using Scheme as a markup language)
- Re: Why Scheme?
- Re: Define in a define
- Re: Where do I get Scheme for Win95/8
- Re: Design patterns as a weapon
- Re: SLG : The Scheme Library Group
- Re: RPN
December
- Re: scope of a declare
- Re: loops with MzScheme
- Re: [closures] compilation of
- Re: how to pass a list in clisp command line as a argument?
- Re: A string of a list
- Re: delete last pair of a dequeue in O(1)
- Re: delete last pair of a dequeue in O(1)
- Re: Generating C++ function interface for embedded Scheme
- Re: Lists question
- Re: Lists question
- Re: GCL some basic questions
- Re: Any "standard collections libraries" for Scheme
- Re: what is scheme not good for
- Re: Unholy combination?
- Re: FAQ?